All the names in this post are
of defendants in BC Supreme Court claims numbers 245869 and 246736. The claims
are public record for anyone to access through the court registry.
I am suing ICBC employees Beata
Siwinski and Edward Leung for fraud and will detail my claim against them and
ICBC to expose ICBC as the corrupt and dysfunctional organization that it is.
I was rear ended by James Joseph
Donald, whom I describe as a psychopath and a dangerous criminal. The
psychopath works for the City of Burnaby in the sewer department. After he rear
ended me he got one of his friends, Sterling Rychkun, who also works at the
city of Burnaby to lie and told ICBC that I cut off James Joseph Donald and
slammed on the brakes.
I filed a claim against the two
for fraud.
ICBC adjuster Beata Siwinski and
her manager Edward Leung, believed the driver's and the witness' story so much
that they decided to fabricate statements themselves and claimed I made those
statements. They wanted to make sure I could never overturn their
decision.
Beata Siwinski, a fraudster,
claimed that I made admissions and contradictory statements by fabricating
statements and claimed I made them. She was directed by her manager, the other
fraudster, Edward Leung, to make up those statements. Unfortunately for both of
them, all my statements to the fraudster Beata Siwinski, were in writing so
they knew if I found out they made those claims against me I would expose their
fraud.
Beata Siwinski made up those
statements in a document called the Rationale which is basically a document
detailing her reasons for determining me 100% responsible for the accident;
responsible for having been rear ended. That document was supposed to be released
to me to inform me of the reasons, but the document was never released to me. In
fact, she and Edward Leung made sure the document was excluded from being
released to me. So, when I filed a Freedom of Information request, the document
was not released to me. Ryan Ruggles, a Freedom of Information Officer at ICBC,
conspired with them to conceal the document from me.
I did not have a clue that
document existed.
You wonder why fabricate
statements on a document that I would never see, simply because every adjuster
and manager who looked at my file, reviewed the adjuster's and her manager's
notes and this Rationale document. They made their decision on that basis. The
fraud was to make sure that no matter who I complained to I would not succeed
in convincing them because I never knew what I was accused of to defend myself
against. I had no clue those criminals fabricated that evidence against me.
I filed two claims one year ago,
the first against the fraudsters James Joesph Donald and Sterling Rychkun, for
fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud, in that they conspired together to
falsely advance Sterling Rychkun as a witness to the accident and submitted
false statements to ICBC. The second against ICBC, Beata Siwinski, Edward
Leung and several other ICBC employees. I allege, in part, fraud and conspiracy
against Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung, for misrepresenting my statements and
the reasons for being held responsible for the accident; including concealing
the Rationale.
ICBC appointed three lawyers, at
our expense of course (BC insured), to defend the fraudsters. You would think
that I mean Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung only but no, ICBC appointed two
lawyers to defend the two fraudsters James Joseph Donald and Sterling Rychkun, the
two I am suing for fraud in an entirely separate claim where they are the only
two people named in n the claim.
ICBC is defending fraudsters
because in this case it suits ICBC. The way civil tort works is that there has
to be an element of loss in order to have a cause for action (at least that is
their strategy, a failed one). If I am found by a court responsible for the
accident then there’s no damage to claim against ICBC and its employees. Even
if I prove Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung are fraudsters, without damage of some
kind or degree, they would get off.
ICBC will do anything including
defend criminals to save itself from liability.
Comments
Post a Comment