Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung- How I discovered their fraud against me.

ICBC employees: Beata Siwinksi’s and Edward Leung’s fraud.
 

For about a year and half I believed that the only reason I was determined 100% responsible was the false witness statement submitted by Sterling Rychkun and focused all my efforts on exposing his and James Joseph Donald’s fraud. I gathered enough evidence and reported my findings to ICBC’s Special Investigation Unit (“SIU”). I was confident it was only a matter of time until they reverse their decision, the evidence was too good to ignore.

I filed complaints with fairness office and talked to ICBC managers and adjusters without getting anywhere. I couldn’t figure out why they were not acting on my complaints.

Finally in October 2021, almost two years after the accident, one adjuster got frustrated with my complaining and sent me a copy and paste of the contents of a document he called the Rationale, and told me that I must’ve received it when I filed a Freedom of Information request; I did not, it was excluded. That was the first I knew of the document and the full reasons for being held responsible for the accident. Beata Siwinski lied and made false claims about me. She pretty much portrayed me as a liar.

That was when I realized that all the time I was asking them to investigate the witness for fraud, I wasn’t actually addressing all the evidence they had against me. A lying witness didn’t concern them at all, they had more evidence against me and I did not refute any of it because I had not clue it existed.

I also found out that the SIU (the special investigation unit) is so special that it did not at all investigate the fraud I reported to them. They have a policy/procedure to ignore reports of fraud if the one who submitted the report was party to the accident.  They forwarded my report to the same adjuster, Beata Siwinski.