Kal v. ICBC

  The reason I frequently name some, not all, the people I am suing has to do with the way their lawyers have been trying to defeat my claims. I have all the evidence I need to prove all my allegations, specially those involving fraud. ICBC uses a software system referred to as EDRMS (Electronic Document and Record Management System) and everything I allege against its employees is documented, logged and recorded in their system.  By filing a claim against them they are obligated to disclose those records which would in effect amount to admissions, there is no way out for them and their lawyers know that very well. Their strategy has been to conceal facts and evidence from the court and file motions to delay my claim against ICBC and their employees. Technically, they requested to separated my claim against ICBC defendants from the driver who rear ended me and stay the claim against ICBC until the resolution of the responsibility for the accident. But to succeed with tha...

  The system and the lawyers have been the most challenging part of my actions against the fraudsters inside and outside of ICBC. As I noted in this  post   ICBC appointed three lawyers to represent their employees and the two criminals  I am accusing of having committed fraud against ICBC itself.  Right from the outset I expected the lawyers to do everything they can to help their clients defeat my claims. That is their duty to their clients. But in saying everything they can I did not expect them to disregard the law and abuse the legal system. Two of them have been coordinating together to deceive the court, not me. I already have all the evidence I need to prove my claims but they are abusing the rules, that were designed to make the system fair and efficient, in order to help their client escape responsibility and with that they have been trying everything to deceive the court, the judges. I did not see that coming. One of them have gone so far...