Skip to main content

Naming names!

 

The reason I frequently name some, not all, the people I am suing has to do with the way their lawyers have been trying to defeat my claims.

I have all the evidence I need to prove all my allegations, specially those involving fraud. ICBC uses a software system referred to as EDRMS (Electronic Document and Record Management System) and everything I allege against its employees is documented, logged and recorded in their system. 

By filing a claim against them they are obligated to disclose those records which would in effect amount to admissions, there is no way out for them and their lawyers know that very well.

Their strategy has been to conceal facts and evidence from the court and file motions to delay my claim against ICBC and their employees. Technically, they requested to separated my claim against ICBC defendants from the driver who rear ended me and stay the claim against ICBC until the resolution of the responsibility for the accident. But to succeed with that motion they have to conceal any relation between the ICBC and the evidence that would link them to the decision on responsibility. 

They went so far as to try to conceal from the court that I was rear ended and that the driver admitted he rear ended me; he contests responsibility but admitted he rear ended me. That detail is very important because it inverts the onus. The onus is not on me, the plaintiff, but is actually on the defendant; he has to prove that he was not negligent. That fact alone defeats their motion to stay the claim against ICBC because as it stands now and until a court decides otherwise, I have cause for action against ICBC and its employees. 

So, what does this have to do naming people? They can not sue me for libel/defamation because if they do, they would be obligated to disclose those records which they so desperately trying to conceal. 

I must note that I do not name anyone who I am not suing for their persons. Those I allege to have been negligent are employees who made mistakes while executing their duty of care and I do not name them, but of course their names are part of a public record.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Witness and the Psychopath - Notice of Civil Claim #245869

Notice of Civil Claim #245869, New Westminster Registry, against James Joesph Donald and Sterling Rychkun. Update: The defendant Sterling Rychkun who claimed he saw me make and abrupt lane change and cutoff the truck then slammed on the brake, amended his response to my claim and in effect admitted he lied to ICBC. He changed his story and stated that he did not see me change lanes.   Sterling Rychkun Amended Response to Civil Claim I filed my claim against the two fraudsters James Joseph Donald and Sterling Rychkun in September of 2022. They are the only two defendants in the claim and I am alleging fraud and conspiracy, more on that below but first a little explanation of ICBC’s role in civil claims. Plaintiffs in civil claims relating to motor vehicle accidents sue the driver or drivers who are alleged to have caused damage to the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs do not usually sue the insurer unless the insurer breached its duty of care or committed some sort of wrong that is distin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thugs with law degrees.

  Joel Morris and Vince Critchley are two lawyers who were assigned by their respective law firms, Harper Grey LLP. and QA Law to represent ICBC, ICBC employees and James Joseph Donald; the defendants I am accusing of fraud and negligence. The two lawyers have no legal skills, the extent of their skills is to lie and deceive. They are nothing more than thugs with law degrees. In time not so distant I will be suing them, their law firms, ICBC and more ICBC employees for fraud and conspiracy. I wonder, I wonder, if criminal conspiracy can be made! After all, they conspired to commit fraud against the court.
Post a Comment
Read more

The case against Joel A Morris of Harper Grey LLP.

 I filed an application that is set to be heard on December 02, 2024.   The application is to set aside a court order that I allege to have been obtained by deceit.  I allege that Joel Morris, a lawyer working with Harper Grey LLP., made false representations in court documents, on which the judge relied. You can download the appiction here:  Application against Joel Morris Note: The document is saved on encrypted server managed by Proton.me.
Post a Comment
Read more