The reason I frequently name
some, not all, the people I am suing has to do with the way their lawyers have
been trying to defeat my claims.
I have all the evidence I need
to prove all my allegations, specially those involving fraud. ICBC uses a
software system referred to as EDRMS (Electronic Document and Record Management
System) and everything I allege against its employees is documented, logged and
recorded in their system.
By filing a claim against them
they are obligated to disclose those records which would in effect amount to admissions,
there is no way out for them and their lawyers know that very well.
Their strategy has been to
conceal facts and evidence from the court and file motions to delay my claim against
ICBC and their employees. Technically, they requested to separated my claim against
ICBC defendants from the driver who rear ended me and stay the claim against
ICBC until the resolution of the responsibility for the accident. But to
succeed with that motion they have to conceal any relation between the ICBC and
the evidence that would link them to the decision on responsibility.
They went so far as to try to
conceal from the court that I was rear ended and that the driver admitted he
rear ended me; he contests responsibility but admitted he rear ended me. That
detail is very important because it inverts the onus. The onus is not on me,
the plaintiff, but is actually on the defendant; he has to prove that he was
not negligent. That fact alone defeats their motion to stay the claim against
ICBC because as it stands now and until a court decides otherwise, I have cause
for action against ICBC and its employees.
So, what does this have to do
naming people? They can not sue me for libel/defamation because if they do,
they would be obligated to disclose those records which they so desperately
trying to conceal.
I must note that I do not name
anyone who I am not suing for their persons. Those I allege to have been
negligent are employees who made mistakes while executing their duty of care
and I do not name them, but of course their names are part of a public record.
Comments
Post a Comment