Skip to main content

Posts

The ICBC fraudsters: Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung

All the names in this post are of defendants in BC Supreme Court claims numbers 245869 and 246736. The claims are public record for anyone to access through the court registry.   I am suing ICBC employees Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung for fraud and will detail my claim against them and ICBC to expose ICBC as the corrupt and dysfunctional organization that it is. I was rear ended by James Joseph Donald, whom I describe as a psychopath and a dangerous criminal. The psychopath works for the City of Burnaby in the sewer department. After he rear ended me he got one of his friends, Sterling Rychkun, who also works at the city of Burnaby to lie and told ICBC that I cut off James Joseph Donald and slammed on the brakes. I filed a claim against the two for fraud.   ICBC adjuster Beata Siwinski and her manager Edward Leung, believed the driver's and the witness' story so much that they decided to fabricate statements themselves and claimed I made those statements.  They wanted t...
Recent posts

Thugs with law degrees.

  Joel Morris and Vince Critchley are two lawyers who were assigned by their respective law firms, Harper Grey LLP. and QA Law to represent ICBC, ICBC employees and James Joseph Donald; the defendants I am accusing of fraud and negligence. The two lawyers have no legal skills, the extent of their skills is to lie and deceive. They are nothing more than thugs with law degrees. In time not so distant I will be suing them, their law firms, ICBC and more ICBC employees for fraud and conspiracy. I wonder, I wonder, if criminal conspiracy can be made! After all, they conspired to commit fraud against the court.

The case against Joel A Morris of Harper Grey LLP.

 I filed an application that is set to be heard on December 02, 2024.   The application is to set aside a court order that I allege to have been obtained by deceit.  I allege that Joel Morris, a lawyer working with Harper Grey LLP., made false representations in court documents, on which the judge relied. You can download the appiction here:  Application against Joel Morris Note: The document is saved on encrypted server managed by Proton.me.

Naming names!

  The reason I frequently name some, not all, the people I am suing has to do with the way their lawyers have been trying to defeat my claims. I have all the evidence I need to prove all my allegations, specially those involving fraud. ICBC uses a software system referred to as EDRMS (Electronic Document and Record Management System) and everything I allege against its employees is documented, logged and recorded in their system.  By filing a claim against them they are obligated to disclose those records which would in effect amount to admissions, there is no way out for them and their lawyers know that very well. Their strategy has been to conceal facts and evidence from the court and file motions to delay my claim against ICBC and their employees. Technically, they requested to separated my claim against ICBC defendants from the driver who rear ended me and stay the claim against ICBC until the resolution of the responsibility for the accident. But to succeed with tha...

An unconscionable thing for one to do towards the other

  The system and the lawyers have been the most challenging part of my actions against the fraudsters inside and outside of ICBC. As I noted in this  post   ICBC appointed three lawyers to represent their employees and the two criminals  I am accusing of having committed fraud against ICBC itself.  Right from the outset I expected the lawyers to do everything they can to help their clients defeat my claims. That is their duty to their clients. But in saying everything they can I did not expect them to disregard the law and abuse the legal system. Two of them have been coordinating together to deceive the court, not me. I already have all the evidence I need to prove my claims but they are abusing the rules, that were designed to make the system fair and efficient, in order to help their client escape responsibility and with that they have been trying everything to deceive the court, the judges. I did not see that coming. One of them have gone so far...

Upcoming posts

  A list of upcoming posts: ICBC lawyers' failed strategy. The law of causation, this is going to be a good one. Hang on tight for this one. The CRT, BC court of appeal ruling and the way out of this conundrum. Proof of pain.  If it wasn't for good luck. The " Psychology  of scarcity".

The Lawyers and the Strategic Alliance Agreement

ICBC appointed three lawyers:   1.       Counsel for ICBC Defendants, he represents ICBC and its employees in claim 246736. 2.       Counsel for James Joesph Donald, he represents him in both claims, 246736: Where I allege he was negligent in the motor vehicle accident.  245869: Where I allege fraud and conspiracy against him and Sterling Rychkun. Meaning, ICBC appointed a lawyer to represent a defendant who is alleged to have committed fraud against ICBC. The victim is helping the criminal who victimized them beat the claim. 3.       Counsel for Sterling Rychkun, he represents him in claim 245869 where he is alleged to have committed fraud against ICBC, and again that means that the victim is assisting the criminal with his defence.    Strategic Alliance Agreement: I recently found out that all three lawyers work for firms that have signed a Strategic Allian...