Skip to main content

The "Rationale"- The object of their fraud.

 

Back to the Rationale,

The "Rationale" is the central document in the fraud orchestrated by Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung.

To make sure I am held responsible for the accident and to make sure I can not successfully overturn their decision, Beata Siwinski, together with Edward Leung, fabricated statements in the Rationale and concealed the document from me. The question is why? They already had a witness, why go so fare and commit what civil courts refers to as "quasi-criminal" conduct and what I straight up call criminal. Why take so much risk?

I can only guess the answer; they most likely knew that Sterling Rychkun was lying and that his lie would be discovered. So they needed something else; but again what good is the Rationale, why?

The answer to that is very simple; this Rationale is the first document anyone looking at my claim looks at. They wanted to make sure if I file a complaint, with the CRT or even internally in ICBC that whoever reviews my claim is deceived by their lies.

And that was exactly what happened, one manager was upfront with me and told me that he did not read every email or very note, but he read the Rationale, the adjusters', and managers' notes, and he believed they came to the correct decision.

If you are following me so far you would recognize that the targets of their fraud were other ICBC managers, CRT officials, etc. They intended to harm me by making sure I can not reverse their decision but I was not the only victim; everyone who relied on their "misrepresentations" (fraud) was their victim.

That is essential in establishing cause for action against them, Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung caused other ICBC employees to rely on their misrepresentations to my detriment.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Witness and the Psychopath - Notice of Civil Claim #245869

Notice of Civil Claim #245869, New Westminster Registry, against James Joesph Donald and Sterling Rychkun. Update: The defendant Sterling Rychkun who claimed he saw me make and abrupt lane change and cutoff the truck then slammed on the brake, amended his response to my claim and in effect admitted he lied to ICBC. He changed his story and stated that he did not see me change lanes.   Sterling Rychkun Amended Response to Civil Claim I filed my claim against the two fraudsters James Joseph Donald and Sterling Rychkun in September of 2022. They are the only two defendants in the claim and I am alleging fraud and conspiracy, more on that below but first a little explanation of ICBC’s role in civil claims. Plaintiffs in civil claims relating to motor vehicle accidents sue the driver or drivers who are alleged to have caused damage to the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs do not usually sue the insurer unless the insurer breached its duty of care or committed some sort of wrong that is distin...
Post a Comment
Read more

The ICBC fraudsters: Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung

All the names in this post are of defendants in BC Supreme Court claims numbers 245869 and 246736. The claims are public record for anyone to access through the court registry.   I am suing ICBC employees Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung for fraud and will detail my claim against them and ICBC to expose ICBC as the corrupt and dysfunctional organization that it is. I was rear ended by James Joseph Donald, whom I describe as a psychopath and a dangerous criminal. The psychopath works for the City of Burnaby in the sewer department. After he rear ended me he got one of his friends, Sterling Rychkun, who also works at the city of Burnaby to lie and told ICBC that I cut off James Joseph Donald and slammed on the brakes. I filed a claim against the two for fraud.   ICBC adjuster Beata Siwinski and her manager Edward Leung, believed the driver's and the witness' story so much that they decided to fabricate statements themselves and claimed I made those statements.  They wanted t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thugs with law degrees.

  Joel Morris and Vince Critchley are two lawyers who were assigned by their respective law firms, Harper Grey LLP. and QA Law to represent ICBC, ICBC employees and James Joseph Donald; the defendants I am accusing of fraud and negligence. The two lawyers have no legal skills, the extent of their skills is to lie and deceive. They are nothing more than thugs with law degrees. In time not so distant I will be suing them, their law firms, ICBC and more ICBC employees for fraud and conspiracy. I wonder, I wonder, if criminal conspiracy can be made! After all, they conspired to commit fraud against the court.
Post a Comment
Read more