Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from November, 2023

Upcoming posts

  A list of upcoming posts: ICBC lawyers' failed strategy. The law of causation, this is going to be a good one. Hang on tight for this one. The CRT, BC court of appeal ruling and the way out of this conundrum. Proof of pain.  If it wasn't for good luck. The " Psychology  of scarcity".

The Lawyers and the Strategic Alliance Agreement

ICBC appointed three lawyers:   1.       Counsel for ICBC Defendants, he represents ICBC and its employees in claim 246736. 2.       Counsel for James Joesph Donald, he represents him in both claims, 246736: Where I allege he was negligent in the motor vehicle accident.  245869: Where I allege fraud and conspiracy against him and Sterling Rychkun. Meaning, ICBC appointed a lawyer to represent a defendant who is alleged to have committed fraud against ICBC. The victim is helping the criminal who victimized them beat the claim. 3.       Counsel for Sterling Rychkun, he represents him in claim 245869 where he is alleged to have committed fraud against ICBC, and again that means that the victim is assisting the criminal with his defence.    Strategic Alliance Agreement: I recently found out that all three lawyers work for firms that have signed a Strategic Allian...

The Witness and the Psychopath - Notice of Civil Claim #245869

Notice of Civil Claim #245869, New Westminster Registry, against James Joesph Donald and Sterling Rychkun. Update: The defendant Sterling Rychkun who claimed he saw me make and abrupt lane change and cutoff the truck then slammed on the brake, amended his response to my claim and in effect admitted he lied to ICBC. He changed his story and stated that he did not see me change lanes.   Sterling Rychkun Amended Response to Civil Claim I filed my claim against the two fraudsters James Joseph Donald and Sterling Rychkun in September of 2022. They are the only two defendants in the claim and I am alleging fraud and conspiracy, more on that below but first a little explanation of ICBC’s role in civil claims. Plaintiffs in civil claims relating to motor vehicle accidents sue the driver or drivers who are alleged to have caused damage to the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs do not usually sue the insurer unless the insurer breached its duty of care or committed some sort of wrong that is distin...

Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung- How I discovered their fraud against me.

ICBC employees: Beata Siwinksi’s and Edward Leung’s fraud.   For about a year and half I believed that the only reason I was determined 100% responsible was the false witness statement submitted by Sterling Rychkun and focused all my efforts on exposing his and James Joseph Donald’s fraud. I gathered enough evidence and reported my findings to ICBC’s Special Investigation Unit (“SIU”). I was confident it was only a matter of time until they reverse their decision, the evidence was too good to ignore. I filed complaints with fairness office and talked to ICBC managers and adjusters without getting anywhere. I couldn’t figure out why they were not acting on my complaints. Finally in October 2021, almost two years after the accident, one adjuster got frustrated with my complaining and sent me a copy and paste of the contents of a document he called the Rationale, and told me that I must’ve received it when I filed a Freedom of Information request; I did not, it was excluded. T...

The "Rationale"- The object of their fraud.

  Back to the Rationale, The "Rationale" is the central document in the fraud orchestrated by Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung. To make sure I am held responsible for the accident and to make sure I can not successfully overturn their decision, Beata Siwinski, together with Edward Leung, fabricated statements in the Rationale and concealed the document from me. The question is why? They already had a witness, why go so fare and commit what civil courts refers to as "quasi-criminal" conduct and what I straight up call criminal. Why take so much risk? I can only guess the answer; they most likely knew that Sterling Rychkun was lying and that his lie would be discovered. So they needed something else; but again what good is the Rationale, why? The answer to that is very simple; this Rationale is the first document anyone looking at my claim looks at. They wanted to make sure if I file a complaint, with the CRT or even internally in ICBC that whoever reviews my cla...

The accident, the fraud, the conspiracy.

 How it all started! It all started on December 16, 2019. A few months after the NDP thugs, Horgan and Eby set out to implement one of the most draconian legislations in BC's history. I was rear ended around 6:00 AM on Canada way, by a pickup truck driven by the psychopath James Joseph Donald who worked at the City of Burnaby. The psychopath got Sterling Rychkun , who also worked at the City of Burnaby, to lie for him and together told ICBC pretty much the same story. They convinced ICBC that I cut him off and slammed on the brakes. The adjuster liked them and their story so much that they believed I was at fault and that I was up to something, maybe they believed I planned the whole thing, not exactly sure yet but whatever they though about me, they were determined that I do not succeed with my plan. They believed I was lying, a fraudster and they must protect British Columbians from the likes of me, so they committed their own fraud. Beata Siwinski was the adjuster who h...