How it all started!
It all started on December 16, 2019. A few months after the NDP thugs,
Horgan and Eby set out to implement one of the most draconian legislations in
BC's history.
I was rear ended around 6:00 AM on Canada way, by a pickup truck driven
by the psychopath James Joseph Donald who worked at the City of Burnaby.
The psychopath got Sterling Rychkun, who also worked at the City of
Burnaby, to lie for him and together told ICBC pretty much the same story. They
convinced ICBC that I cut him off and slammed on the brakes.
The adjuster liked them and their story so much that they believed I was
at fault and that I was up to something, maybe they believed I planned the
whole thing, not exactly sure yet but whatever they though about me, they were
determined that I do not succeed with my plan. They believed I was lying, a
fraudster and they must protect British Columbians from the likes of me, so
they committed their own fraud.
Beata Siwinski was the adjuster who handled
my claim and "investigated" the accident. It appears that she was
very closely managed by Edward Leung and I believe he directed her on
many issues relating to my claims. Together, Edward Leung and Beata Siwinski,
fabricated statements and claimed I made them. Statement that included making
admissions, contradictory/inconsistent statements, and refusing to cooperate.
All of which are lies; fabricated by the two of them.
Beata Siwinski fabricated those statements in an electronic document
named "Rationale", this is the document where she wrote her decision
and the reasons for arriving to that decision.
This document was supposed to be released to me; it makes sense to tell
the person who will suffer the consequences of why that is. But of course, if
the document was disclosed to me, I would've discovered their fraud, so they
concealed the document from me.
How they concealed the document needs a bit of explanation. The adjuster
never gave me any information, just questions that I had to answer, that was
pretty much it. No matter how many times I asked for information so I can
answer properly to whatever allegations made against me, she refused. When Beata
Siwinski finally made her decision, she emailed me and told me that I was found
100% responsible on the basis of the Sterling Rychkun's statement, who she
described as and independent witness. The only way I was able to receive any
information is by submitting a Freedom of Information request. There is a
department that processes these requests, gathers the documents and releases
the to me after redacting or excluding documents.
So, what Beata Siwinski and Edward Leung did was to make sure that this
document was excluded. The Rationale was never released to me. I had to rely on
what she told me in her email to me, that she relied on Sterling Rychkun's
statement.
The consequence of their fraud is that I spent about a year and a half
investigating Sterling Rychkun and gathered evidence to prove that he could not
have seen the accident. More on this later.
Comments
Post a Comment